[2006, RC Text 4]

    Many things make people think artists are weird. But the weirdest may be this: artists’ only job is to explore emotions, and yet they choose to focus on the ones that feel bad.

    This wasn’t always so. The earliest forms of art, like painting and music, are those best suited for expressing joy. But somewhere from the 19th century onward, more artists began seeing happiness as meaningless, phony or, worst of all, boring, as we went from Wordsworth’s daffodils to Baudelaire’s flowers of evil.

    You could argue that art became more skeptical of happiness because modern times have seen so much misery. But it’s not as if earlier times didn’t know perpetual war, disaster and the massacre of innocents. The reason, in fact, may be just the opposite: there is too much damn happiness in the world today.

    After all, what is the one modern form of expression almost completely dedicated to depicting happiness? Advertising. The rise of anti-happy art almost exactly tracks the emergence of mass media, and with it, a commercial culture in which happiness is not just an ideal but an ideology.

    People in earlier eras were surrounded by reminders of misery. They worked until exhausted, lived with few protections and died young. In the West, before mass communication and literacy, the most powerful mass medium was the church, which reminded worshippers that their souls were in danger and that they would someday be meat for worms. Given all this, they did not exactly need their art to be a bummer too.

    Today the messages the average Westerner is surrounded with are not religious but commercial, and forever happy. Fast-food eaters, news anchors, text messengers, all smiling, smiling, smiling. Our magazines feature beaming celebrities and happy families in perfect homes. And since these messages have an agenda -- to lure us to open our wallets -- they make the very idea of happiness seem unreliable. "Celebrate!" commanded the ads for the arthritis drug Celebrex, before we found out it could increase the risk of heart attacks.

    But what we forget -- what our economy depends on us forgetting -- is that happiness is more than pleasure without pain. The things that bring the greatest joy carry the greatest potential for loss and disappointment. Today, surrounded by promises of easy happiness, we need art to tell us, as religion once did, Memento mori: remember that you will die, that everything ends, and that happiness comes not in denying this but in living with it. It’s a message even more bitter than a clove cigarette, yet, somehow, a breath of fresh air. (433 words)

    Notes: weird adj. 不可思議的，離奇古怪的。phony (=phoney) 假裝的，冒充的，偽造的。Wordsworth (1770 – 1850) 英國(guó)詩(shī)人。daffodil n.水仙花。Baudelaire (1821 – 1867) 法國(guó)詩(shī)人及散文家。damn adj. （表示不滿、憤怒、不耐煩等）：Where is that damn book? 那本該死的書(shū)在哪里？My damn car has broken down! 我的混賬汽車(chē)壞了。memento 紀(jì)念品。Memento mori人總有一死。

    1. By citing the examples of poets Wordsworth and Baudetaire, the author intends to show that

    [A] poetry is not as expressive of joy as painting or music.

    [B] art grows out of both positive and negative feelings.

    [C] poets today are less skeptical of happiness.

    [D] artists have changed their focus of interest.

    2. The word "bummer" (Line 4, Paragraph 5) most probably means something

    [A] religious. [B] unpleasant. [C] entertaining. [D] commercial.

    3. In the author's opinion, advertising

    [A] emerges in the wake of the anti-happy art. [B] is a cause of disappointment for the general public.

    [C] replaces the church as a major source of information. [D] creates an illusion of happiness rather than happiness itself.

    4. We can learn from the last paragraph that the author believes

    [A] happiness more often than not ends in sadness. [B] the anti-happy art is distasteful but refreshing.

    [C] misery should be enjoyed rather than denied. [D] the anti-happy art flourishes when economy booms.

    5. Which of the following is true of the text?

    [A] Religion once functioned as a reminder of misery. [B] Art provides a balance between expectation and reality.

    [C] People feel disappointed at the realities of modem society [D] Mass media are inclined to cover disasters and deaths.

    Text 2

    [2005, RC Text 4]

    Americans no longer expect public figures, whether in speech or in writing, to command the English language with skill and gift. Nor do they aspire to such command themselves. In his latest book, Doing Our Own Thing. The Degradation of Language and Music and Why We Should, Like, Care, John McWhorter, a linguist and controversialist of mixed liberal and conservative views, sees the triumph of 1960s counter-culture as responsible for the decline of formal English.

    Blaming the permissive 1960s is nothing new, but this is not yet another criticism against the decline in education. Mr. McWhorter's academic specialty is language history and change, and he sees the gradual disappearance of "whom", for example, to be natural and no more regrettable than the loss of the case-endings of Old English.

    But the cult of the authentic and the personal, "doing our own thing", has spelt the death of formal speech, writing, poetry and music. While even the modestly educated sought an elevated tone when they put pen to paper before the 1960s, even the most well regarded writing since then has sought to capture spoken English on the page. Equally, in poetry, the highly personal, performative genre is the only form that could claim real liveliness. In both oral and written English, talking is triumphing over speaking, spontaneity over craft.

    Illustrated with an entertaining array of examples from both high and low culture, the trend that Mr. McWhorter documents is unmistakable. But it is less clear, to take the question of his subtitle, why we should, like, care. As a linguist, he acknowledges that all varieties of human language, including non-standard ones like Black English, can be powerfully expressive -- there exists no language or dialect in the world that cannot convey complex ideas. He is not arguing, as many do, that we can no longer think straight because we do not talk proper.

    Russians have a deep love for their own language and carry large chunks of memorized poetry in their heads, while Italian politicians tend to elaborate speech that would seem old-fashioned to most English-speakers. Mr. McWhorter acknowledges that formal language is not strictly necessary, and proposes no radical education reforms -- he is really grieving over the loss of something beautiful more than useful. We now take our English "on paper plates instead of china". A shame, perhaps, but probably an inevitable one. (391 words)

    Notes: aspire to (after) 渴望成就…。degradation n. 退化；墮落，貶低，降低。permissive 放任的。specialty (=speciality)專業(yè)。no more … than …與…一樣都不…。cult n. 膜拜。authentic adj. 真實(shí)的。spell vt. 招致；意味著。elevated adj. 高架的；有修養(yǎng)的。put pen to paper（開(kāi)始）寫(xiě)信。performative 有表演力的。genre 種類；風(fēng)格，體裁。triumph over勝過(guò)。spontaneity 自發(fā)性。craft工藝性。 entertaining adj. 令人感興趣的。array n. 系列；大量。subtitle 副標(biāo)題。dialect 方言。think straight 有條理地思維。talk proper 說(shuō)話規(guī)范。chunk n. 相當(dāng)數(shù)量。

    1. According to McWhorter, the decline of formal English

    [A] is inevitable in radical education reforms. [B] is but all too natural in language development.

    [C] has caused the controversy over the counter-culture. [D] brought about changes in public attitudes in the 1960s.

    2. The word "talking" (Line 4, Paragraph 3) denotes

    [A] modesty. [B] personality. [C] liveliness. [D] informality.

    3. To which of the following statements would McWhorter most likely agree?

    [A] Logical thinking is not necessarily related to the way we talk.

    [B] Black English can be more expressive than standard English.

    [C] Non-standard varieties of human language are just as entertaining.

    [D] Of all the varieties, standard English can best convey complex ideas.

    4. The description of Russians' love of memorizing poetry shows the author's

    [A] interest in their language. [B] appreciation of their efforts.

    [C] admiration for their memory. [D] contempt for their old-fashionedness.

    5. According to the last paragraph, "paper plates" is to "china" as

    [A] "temporary" is to "permanent". [B] "radical" is to "conservative".

    [C] "functional" is to "artistic". [D] "humble" is to "noble".

    Word Study

    command [k m nd] v. 1.命令，吩咐：I command you to start at once.(我命令你立即出發(fā)。) She commanded that we (should) attack at once.(她命令我們立即進(jìn)攻。) He commanded silence.(他吩咐安靜。) 2.指揮（部隊(duì)），控制:General Smith commanded the army. (史密斯將軍指揮軍隊(duì)。) 3.掌握，支配: He commands a large vocabulary. (他掌握大量詞匯。) 4.得到，值得（尊敬，同情等）：This great man is able to command everyone’s respect. (這位偉人能得到人人尊敬。) 5.俯瞰（因而可以控制）：The castle commanded the whole town. (這個(gè)城堡俯瞰整個(gè)城鎮(zhèn)。) n. 命令；指揮；掌握，控制；司令部，指揮部。成語(yǔ) at sb’s command 聽(tīng)候差遣[吩咐]，由…掌握：I’m at your command. (我聽(tīng)你的差遣。) by sb’s command 根據(jù)…的命令：It was done by the Queen’s command. (這是按女王命令辦的。) in command (of) 指揮，控制：Who is in command here?(誰(shuí)在這里指揮？) take command of (開(kāi)始)指揮：When the major was killed, the senior captain took command of the company. (當(dāng)少校陣亡了，大尉開(kāi)始指揮步兵連。)

    aspire (after or to) vi. (=direct one’s hopes and efforts to some great aims)渴望（得到或成為…），有…的雄心［野心］：He aspired after knowledge/to the highest positions/to be come president. (他渴望知/爬上比較高職務(wù)/成為總統(tǒng)。)

    Text 3

    The good news made headlines nationwide: Deaths from several kinds of cancer have declined significantly in recent years. But the news has to be bittersweet for many cancer patients and their families. Every year, more than 500,000 people in the United States still die of cancer. In fact, more than half of all patients diagnosed with cancer will die of their disease within a few years. And while it is true that survival is longer today than in the past, the quality of life for these patients is often greatly diminished. Cancer – and many of the treatments used to fight it – causes pain, nausea, fatigue, and anxiety that routinely go undertreated or untreated.

    In the nation’s single-minded focus on curing cancer, we have unintentionally devalued the critical need for palliative care, which focuses on alleviating physical and psychological symptoms over the course of the disease. Nothing would have a greater impact on the daily lives of cancer patients and their families than good symptom control and supportive therapy. Yet the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the federal government’s leader in cancer research and training, spent less than 1 percent of its 1999 budget on any aspect of research or training in palliative care.

    The nation needs to get serious about reducing needless suffering. NCI should commit itself to and fund research aimed at improving symptom control and palliative care. NCI also could designate “centers of excellence” among the cancer centers it recognizes. To get that designation, centers would deliver innovative, top-quality palliative care to all segments of the populations the centers serve; train professionals in medicine, nursing, psychology, social work, and other disciplines to provide palliative care; and conduct research.

    Insurance coverage for palliative and hospice care also contributes to the problem by forcing people to choose between active treatment or hospice care. This “either/or” approach does not readily allow these two types of essential care to be integrated. The Medicare hospice benefit is designed specially for people in the final stages of illness and allows enrollment only if patients are expected to survive six months or less. The benefit excludes patients from seeking both palliative care and potentially life-extending treatment.

    That makes hospice enrollment an obvious deterrent for many patients. And hospices, which may have the most skilled practitioners and the most experience in administering palliative care, cannot offer their services to people who could really benefit but still are pursuing active treatment.

    Death is inevitable, but severe suffering is not. To offer hope for a long life of the highest possible quality and to deliver the best quality cancer care from diagnosis to death, our public institutions need to move towards policies that value and promote palliative care. (449 words)

    Notes: nausea 惡心；single-minded 一心一意的；palliative 減輕的，緩解的；palliative care 姑息治療；commit oneself to 承擔(dān)去做…；insurance coverage保險(xiǎn)復(fù)蓋范圍； hospice (晚期病人)收容所，收容計(jì)劃；Medicare [美] 老年醫(yī)療保健制度 （指政府為65歲以上老人設(shè)置的醫(yī)療費(fèi)減免制度）；benefit保險(xiǎn)金；deterrent 威懾力量；制止因素；administer給予；實(shí)施，執(zhí)行。

    1. According to the first paragraph, what is the author’s attitude towards the good news?

    A. He believes that dramatic results have been made in cancer research.

    B. He has mixed feelings about the rapid decline in deaths from cancer.

    C. He deems that a large number of cancer patients still die every year.

    D. He thinks many by-effects brought by cancer treatments are severe.

    2. It can be learned from the text that palliative care is intended to __________.

    A. raise patients’ survival rates B. extend patients’ life spans

    C. improve patients’ quality of life D. provide patients with health insurance

    3. According to the author, research on palliative care for cancer __________.

    A. has been overlooked by the NCI B. has gained the active support of the nation

    C. has been overfunded by the NCI D. is of greater significance than research on cancer cures

    4. The main issue of insurance coverage for hospice care and active treatment is that __________.

    A. it does not allow patients to seek both simultaneously

    B. it only covers patients whose life expectancy is less than six months

    C. hospice care is only covered when it may extend a patient’s life expectancy

    D. it deprives patients of the right to choose between two proven treatment methods

    5. Which of the following best expresses the main idea of the text?

    A. Improving cancer research in the U.S. B. Alleviating the suffering of cancer patients

    C. Reforming insurance coverage for cancer patients D. Choosing active treatment or palliative care for patients

    Word Study

    1.squeeze vt. 擠、壓、擰；塞進(jìn)；擠進(jìn)：1) He squeezed the last bit from the tooth-paste tube. (他從牙膏筒里擠出了比較后一點(diǎn)牙膏。) 2) Squeeze the walnuts together to crack them. (把核桃放在一起擠壓以便敲碎它們。) 3) He squeezed an extra shirt into the suitcase. (他把又一件襯衣塞進(jìn)箱子。) 4) Can’t you squeeze more juice out of that lemon? (你能否從那個(gè)檸檬中擠出更多的汁來(lái)？) squeeze n. (經(jīng)濟(jì)術(shù)語(yǔ))銀根緊的時(shí)候：We cannot borrow money during the present credit squeeze. (在目前信貸緊縮時(shí)期我們無(wú)法借到更多的錢(qián)。)

    2. swing vi. 擺動(dòng)：1) His arms swing as he walks. 2) The door swung open. （門(mén)擺動(dòng)開(kāi)了。） swing n. 變動(dòng)，波動(dòng)：swings in the oil price 油價(jià)波動(dòng)。用于成語(yǔ)：in full swing （某活動(dòng)）全面展開(kāi)，達(dá)到高潮：1) Everything seemed to be in full swing there. 2) It was Saturday night; the little party was in full swing. 3) The work was in full swing when we arrived. 4) When we arrived, the meeting was already in full swing. 5) Ten weeks before the election the campaign was in full swing.

    3. 經(jīng)濟(jì)方面的短語(yǔ)：economic decline經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退；a swing in prices價(jià)格波動(dòng)；supply-cut供應(yīng)減少；double-digit inflation兩位數(shù)的通貨膨脹；economic consequences經(jīng)濟(jì)上產(chǎn)生的后果；retail price零售價(jià)；energy conservation能源保護(hù)；oil import bill石油進(jìn)口開(kāi)支；oil shock石油恐慌；energy-intensive能源密集型的；price index價(jià)格指數(shù)。

    Text 4

    [2004 RC Text 4 ]

    Americans today don’t place a very high value on intellect. Our heroes are athletes, entertainers, and entrepreneurs, not scholars. Even our schools are where we send our children to get a practical education – not to pursue knowledge for the sake of knowledge. Symptoms of pervasive anti-intellectualism in our schools aren’t difficult to find.

    “Schools have always been in a society where practical is more important than intellectual,” says education writer Diane Ravitch. “Schools could be a counterbalance.” Ravitch’s latest book, Left Back: A Century of Failed School Reforms, traces the roots of anti-intellectualism in our schools, concluding they are anything but a counterbalance to the American distaste for intellectual pursuits.

    But they could and should be. Encouraging kids to reject the life of the mind leaves them vulnerable to exploitation and control. Without the ability to think critically, to defend their ideas and understand the ideas of others, they cannot fully participate in our democracy. Continuing along this path, says writer Earl Shorris, “We will become a second-rate country. We will have a less civil society.”

    “Intellect is resented as a form of power or privilege,” writes historian and professor Richard Hofstadter in Anti-Intellectualism in American Life, a Pulitzer Prize winning book on the roots of anti-intellectualism in US politics, religion, and education. From the beginning of our history, says Hofstadter, our democratic and populist urges have driven us to reject anything that smells of elitism. Practicality, common sense, and native intelligence have been considered more noble qualities than anything you could learn from a book.

    Ralph Waldo Emerson and other transcendentalist philosophers thought schooling and rigorous book learning put unnatural restraints on children:” We are shut up in schools and college recitation rooms for 10 or 15 years and come out at last with a bellyful of words and do not know a thing.” Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn exemplified American anti-intellectualism. Its hero avoids being civilized – going to school and learning to read – so he can preserve his innate goodness.

    Intellect, according to Hofstadter, is different from native intelligence, a quality we reluctantly admire. Intellect is the critical, creative, and contemplative side of the mind. Intelligence seeks to grasp, manipulate, re-order, and adjust, while intellect examines, ponders, wonders, theorizes, criticizes and imagines.

    School remains a place where intellect is mistrusted. Hofstadter says our country’s educational system is in the grips of people who “joyfully and militantly proclaim their hostility to intellect and their eagerness to identify with children who show the least intellectual promise.” (414 words)

    Notes：intellect 才智，智能。entertainers 表演家。entrepreneurs 企業(yè)家。pervasive 彌漫的，滲透的，遍布的。intellectualism （哲）主知主義（主張知識(shí)為純理性的產(chǎn)物）。counterbalance 平衡力，起平衡作用的因素。anything but 根本不。distaste (for) n. 厭惡，不喜歡。populist adj.平民主義的。elitism 杰出人物統(tǒng)治論，高人一等的優(yōu)越感。complementary 補(bǔ)充的，互補(bǔ)的。civil 公民的；文明的。transcendentalist 先驗(yàn)論的。rigorous 嚴(yán)格的，嚴(yán)厲的。a bellyful of 滿腹的。innate 天生的，先天的。contemplative 沉思的。

    1. What do American parents expect their children to acquire in school?

    A. The habit of thinking independently. B. Profound knowledge of the world.

    C. Practical ability for future career. D. The confidence in intellectual pursuits.

    2. We can learn from the text that Americans have a history of

    A. undervaluing intellect. B. favoring intellectualism.

    C. supporting school reform D. suppressing native intelligence.

    3. The views of Ravitch and Emerson on schooling are

    A. identical. B. similar. C. complementary. D. opposite.

    4. Emerson, according to the text, is probably

    A. a pioneer of education reform. B. an opponent of intellectualism.

    C. a scholar in favor of intellectualism. D. an advocate of regular schooling.

    5. What does the author think of intellect?

    A. It is second to intelligence. B. It evolves from common sense.

    C. It is to be pursued. D. It underlies power.

    III. Writing

    (I)

    Directions: In this part, you are to write an essay of 160—200 words entitled “On Developing Tourism”. Your essay should be based on the outline below:

    1. Present situation,

    2. Benefits brought by tourism,

    3. Obstacles to the development of tourism,

    4. My view on future prospect.

    旅游業(yè)----"無(wú)煙的工業(yè)"----正在中國(guó)迅速發(fā)展。隨著改革開(kāi)放政策的貫徹執(zhí)行, 數(shù)以萬(wàn)計(jì)的外國(guó)游人涌入中國(guó)。他們渴望參觀這個(gè)具有5000多年?duì)N爛文化的神秘古國(guó)。

    旅游業(yè)作為一種商業(yè)活動(dòng)給中國(guó)帶來(lái)許多好處。首先, 在經(jīng)濟(jì)上它有利于我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展。正如你們所知道的,中國(guó)需要大量的外匯來(lái)執(zhí)行現(xiàn)代化建設(shè)計(jì)劃。旅游業(yè)是獲取外匯的比較重要的渠道之一。其次, 旅游業(yè)使中國(guó)人民更多地了解外界。另一方面, 訪問(wèn)過(guò)中國(guó)的外國(guó)人對(duì)我國(guó)的比較新發(fā)展和我國(guó)人民的友好和殷勤留下了深刻的印象。顯然，旅游業(yè)大大促進(jìn)了中國(guó)人民和世界各族人民之間的友誼和了解。

    然而, 仍然存在兩個(gè)障礙妨礙著旅游業(yè)的發(fā)展。一方面, 許多地區(qū)的運(yùn)輸系統(tǒng)效率不高無(wú)法滿足日益增長(zhǎng)的需要。另一方面，我們的許多名勝地還要多做廣告，讓全世界都知道它們，以便吸引更多的旅游者。因此, 我們還有許多困難要克服。

    至于我, 我相信, 隨著我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展, 這些問(wèn)題必將逐步得到解決。我們期望有一個(gè)更美好、更光明的未來(lái)。

    Tourism, a smokeless industry, is developing rapidly in China. With the reform and opening-up policy being carried out, thousands upon thousands of foreign visitors are pouring into our country. They are eager to see(=visit) this old mysterious land with a splendid culture of more than 5,000 years.

    Tourism as a form of enterprise brings China a lot of benefits. In the first place, it is financially beneficial to the economic development of China. As you know, China needs a growing amount of foreign currencies for its modernization program. Tourism is one of the most important channels to obtain them. Secondly, tourism enables the Chinese people to know more about the outside world. On the other hand, the foreigners who have visited China are deeply impressed by the latest developments of our country and the friendliness and hospitality of our people. It is clear that tourism contributes a great deal to the friendship and mutual understanding between the Chinese people and peoples all over the world.

    There are, however, still two obstacles hindering the expansion of tourism in our country. For one thing, the transportation system in many areas is not efficient enough to meet the ever-increasing needs. For another, our places of interest have yet to be better advertised. Information about them should be made available throughout the world to attract more and more tourists. Therefore, we still have a long way to go.

    As for me, with the development of our national economy, all these problems will certainly be solved step by step. A much better and brighter future awaits us. (262words)

    背記重點(diǎn)詞語(yǔ)漢英對(duì)照： 1. 成千上萬(wàn)：thousands upon thousands of; 數(shù)以百計(jì)：hundreds of。 2. 擁入：pour into; crowd into; stream into; swarm into。 3. 渴望做某事：be eager to do sth.; desire strongly to do sth.; aspire to do sth.; long to do sth. ; 渴望某事：be eager for sth.; desire sth.; aspire after/to sth.; long for sth. 4. 使某人能做某事：enable sb. to do sth.。 5. 有助于，促進(jìn)，增加：contribute to sth.。 6. 阻礙某人做某事：hinder sb. from doing sth.; stop sb. from doing sth.; 阻礙某事：obstruct sth.。 7. 盼望，等待：sth. await(s) sb. = sb. look(s) forward to sth., 例如：A much better and brighter future awaits us. = We are looking forward to a much better and brighter future.

    Put the following sentences from Chinese into English:

    1. 數(shù)以百計(jì)的學(xué)生擁入大廳去看這位歌星。

    2. 1)他渴望成功。 2)他渴望知識(shí)。 3)他渴望成為一個(gè)超級(jí)明星。

    3. 雖然我們還有許多困難要克服，但是我們對(duì)未來(lái)充滿信心。

    4. 1)她的著作極有助于我們對(duì)這個(gè)困難課題的了解。[ALD] 2)汽車(chē)增加了空氣污染。

    5. 總之，我們盼望一個(gè)更美好、更光明的未來(lái)。

    (II) (課外背誦篇)

    Directions: Study the following pie chart carefully and write an essay entitled “Investment in Beijing from Different Countries and Regions”. Your essay should meet the requirements below:

    1. Describe the pie chart,

    2. State the possible benefits brought by outside investment,

    3. Suggest measures helping to attract investment from outside.

    自從1979年中國(guó)對(duì)外開(kāi)放以來(lái)，北京在吸引外企投資合資企業(yè)方面已取得了顯著成績(jī)。根據(jù)圖示，不同企業(yè)的投資者來(lái)自26個(gè)國(guó)家和地區(qū)。香港的投資額居第一位，占總額的44%。日本占19.2%, 居第二位。美國(guó)為第三，占16%。

    普遍認(rèn)為，北京從外部投資中受益匪淺。首先，大量合資企業(yè)已經(jīng)建立，這就大大促進(jìn)了“首都經(jīng)濟(jì)”的發(fā)展。其次，外資企業(yè)為北京市民提供了許多就業(yè)機(jī)會(huì)。這又緩解了北京的下崗工人問(wèn)題。比較后，由于北京和沿海開(kāi)放城市一樣享有許多優(yōu)惠政策，所以高科技產(chǎn)業(yè)在首都發(fā)展迅猛。

    至于吸引外資的措施，有如下幾點(diǎn)。一方面，我們應(yīng)該專門(mén)努力來(lái)改善投資環(huán)境, 以便越來(lái)越多的外資能流入北京。另一方面，我們應(yīng)該抓住機(jī)遇把目前的外資企業(yè)盡可能辦好。我深信，隨著改革開(kāi)放政策的貫徹執(zhí)行，北京將吸引大量外資。

    Since China opened its door to the outside world in 1979, Beijing has made remarkable results in attracting foreign business to invest in joint ventures. According to the pie chart, the investors in different enterprises come from 26 countries and regions. The investment of Hong Kong ranks first, accounting for 44 per cent of the total. Japan’s investment makes up 19.2 per cent, putting it in second spot. Third is the United States at 16 per cent.

    It is generally believed that Beijing benefits a lot from the outside investment. In the first place, a large number of joint ventures have been set up, which contributes greatly to the development of Capital Economy. Secondly, the foreign-invested enterprises offer a lot of jobs to the residents in Beijing. This in turn relieves the problem of laid-off workers in the city. Finally, the high-tech enterprises in the capital will grow rapidly as Beijing enjoys the same preferential policies as coastal cities open to the outside world.

    As far as the measures to attract outside investment are concerned, they are as follows. On the one hand, we should make special efforts to improve the investment environment so that an increasing amount of foreign capital can stream into Beijing. On the other hand, we should take advantage of this opportunity to run the present foreign-invested enterprises as efficiently as possible. I am convinced that with the reform and opening up policy being implemented, Beijing will be a great attraction for foreign investment. (247 words)

    作業(yè)：1.每天做“復(fù)習(xí)指導(dǎo)”閱讀理解1 -- 2篇、英譯漢2--3天一篇。 2. 改寫(xiě)本單元作文。3. 詞匯要結(jié)合書(shū)中的內(nèi)容反復(fù)背記。

    贈(zèng)言：1. 一面學(xué)習(xí)、一面思考，學(xué)習(xí)使人增加知識(shí)，而思考則使人把知識(shí)總結(jié)成規(guī)律，再在實(shí)踐中轉(zhuǎn)化為解決問(wèn)題的能力。

    2. 現(xiàn)象是多變的，本質(zhì)是基本不變的, 它是事物內(nèi)部的因果性、必然性和規(guī)律性。所以本質(zhì)，一般來(lái)說(shuō)，就是規(guī)律。只有把握規(guī)律的人才能從必然王國(guó)過(guò)渡到自由王國(guó)。

    Text 1 考考譯文

    有許多事情使人們認(rèn)為藝術(shù)家離奇古怪。但是比較怪異的事情可能是，藝術(shù)家的惟一工作是探索情感，而且喜歡關(guān)注那些負(fù)面情感。

    但情況并不總是這樣的。諸如繪畫(huà)和音樂(lè)這樣的早期藝術(shù)形式比較適合于表達(dá)喜悅之心。但是從大約19世紀(jì)后，隨著我們從英國(guó)詩(shī)人渥茲華斯的水仙花到法國(guó)詩(shī)人波多雷的邪惡之花，更多的藝術(shù)家開(kāi)始把幸福視為毫無(wú)意義的、虛偽的，甚至是令人厭倦的。

    你可能會(huì)辯解說(shuō)，藝術(shù)對(duì)幸福更為懷疑，這是因?yàn)楝F(xiàn)代社會(huì)目睹了如此眾多的苦難。但是這并不是說(shuō)，好像以前就沒(méi)有無(wú)休止的戰(zhàn)亂、災(zāi)難及對(duì)無(wú)辜者的屠殺。事實(shí)上，藝術(shù)對(duì)幸福懷疑的原因可能恰恰相反：在今天的世界上混賬的幸福實(shí)在太多了。

    雖然這樣，那什么是幾乎能夠完全致力于描繪幸福的一種現(xiàn)代表達(dá)方式呢? 廣告業(yè)。反幸福藝術(shù)(=宣揚(yáng)不幸的藝術(shù))的興起幾乎完全是隨著大眾媒體的出現(xiàn)而接踵而至的；隨之，出現(xiàn)了商業(yè)廣告文化，其中幸福不僅僅是一種理想，而且還是一種思想意識(shí)。

    早期的人們到處都能感悟苦難。他們一直工作到筋疲力盡，生活幾無(wú)保障，年紀(jì)輕輕就嗚呼哀哉。在西方，在大眾宣傳工具和閱讀書(shū)寫(xiě)之前，比較有力的大眾傳媒是教堂。它可以使那些做禮拜的人想到，他們的心靈處于危險(xiǎn)之中，有朝一日他們可能會(huì)成為壞人的盤(pán)中之餐�？紤]到這一切，人們也確實(shí)不需要讓藝術(shù)也變成令人不快的東西了。

    如今，普通西方人的周?chē)�不是宗教信��，而是商業(yè)信息以及永遠(yuǎn)快樂(lè)的信息。吃快餐的人、新聞主持人、郵遞員，所有的人都在不停地微笑著。我們的雜志為容光煥發(fā)的名人和住在漂亮房子里的幸福家庭做特寫(xiě)。因?yàn)檫@些信息有日程安排 －以便誘惑我們打開(kāi)錢(qián)包，它們使幸福的概念變得似乎不太可靠。廣告為治療關(guān)節(jié)炎的藥物Celebrex發(fā)出命令：“慶祝！”�？珊髞�(lái)我們發(fā)現(xiàn)，這種藥可能增加患心臟病的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，

    但是我們所忘記的東西，即我們的經(jīng)濟(jì)指望我們忘記的東西，是幸福不僅僅是沒(méi)有痛苦的快樂(lè)。那些能夠帶來(lái)巨大快樂(lè)的東西也有可能帶來(lái)巨大的潛在的損失和失望。今天，我們周?chē)�到處都是唾手可得的幸福的承諾，我們需要藝術(shù)來(lái)告訴我們死亡的象征，就像過(guò)去一度宗教所做的那樣，即記住，人是會(huì)死的，一切都會(huì)結(jié)束；記住，幸福不是否認(rèn)死亡，而是與死亡共存。這個(gè)信息比丁香香煙還苦，但是，由于某種原因，它又是一股新鮮空氣。

    Text 2 考考譯文

    美國(guó)人不再期望公眾人物無(wú)論在講演或在書(shū)寫(xiě)中熟練地、天才地掌握英語(yǔ)語(yǔ)言。他們自己也沒(méi)有這樣的雄心。既有自由派又有保守派觀點(diǎn)的語(yǔ)言學(xué)家兼善辯家John McWhorter在他的近著《Doing Our Own Thing. The Degradation of Language and Music and Why We Should, Like, Care》中認(rèn)為，20世紀(jì)60年代反傳統(tǒng)文化的勝利是造成規(guī)范英語(yǔ)衰落的原因。

    譴責(zé)放任的六十年代并不是什么新鮮的事，但是這還不是再次批判教育的衰退。McWhorter先生的學(xué)術(shù)專業(yè)是語(yǔ)言歷史和變遷。他認(rèn)為，諸如“whom”一詞的逐漸消失是自然的，與古英語(yǔ)格結(jié)尾的消失一樣并沒(méi)有什么可遺憾的。

    可是，膜拜真實(shí)性和個(gè)性化，即所謂“做我們自己的事情”，已經(jīng)招致了規(guī)范語(yǔ)言、作品、詩(shī)歌和音樂(lè)的衰亡。盡管六十年代以前有一定文化的人寫(xiě)信時(shí)也尋求高雅的筆調(diào)，但是從那時(shí)以來(lái)甚至比較受好評(píng)的作品也一直捕捉報(bào)紙上的口頭英語(yǔ)。同樣，在詩(shī)歌中，高度個(gè)性化的、極具表演力的風(fēng)格成了可以稱作真正生動(dòng)活潑的惟一形式。在口頭和書(shū)面英語(yǔ)中，談話語(yǔ)體戰(zhàn)勝了講演語(yǔ)體，自發(fā)性戰(zhàn)勝了工藝性。

    來(lái)自高低文化層次的大量令人高興的例子說(shuō)明，McWhorter先生書(shū)中所證明的趨勢(shì)是不會(huì)錯(cuò)的。但是，拿他這本書(shū)的副標(biāo)題所提出的問(wèn)題“為什么我們應(yīng)該，喜歡，照料”來(lái)看，這一趨勢(shì)并不清楚。作為語(yǔ)言學(xué)家，他承認(rèn)，人類語(yǔ)言的形形式式的種類，包括像黑人英語(yǔ)這樣的非標(biāo)準(zhǔn)語(yǔ)言，都可以有很強(qiáng)的表達(dá)力 － 世界上沒(méi)有一種語(yǔ)言或方言不能傳遞復(fù)雜的思想。與很多人不一樣的是，他并不認(rèn)為，因?yàn)槲覀冎v話不規(guī)范所以我們思維混亂。

    俄羅斯人深深熱愛(ài)自己的語(yǔ)言并且在他們的頭腦里背誦了大量詩(shī)歌，而意大利政治家們往往對(duì)語(yǔ)言精雕細(xì)刻，這就使許多講英語(yǔ)的人似乎覺(jué)得老氣橫秋。McWhorter先生承認(rèn)，規(guī)范語(yǔ)言并不是絕對(duì)必要的，他并沒(méi)有提出激進(jìn)的教育改革 － 他只是對(duì)語(yǔ)言中美好有余、實(shí)用不足的東西的丟失而感到傷感。我們現(xiàn)在用“紙盤(pán)子而不是瓷盤(pán)子”來(lái)盛我們的英語(yǔ)大餐�；蛟S，這樣做不好看，但很可能這是必然的。

    Text 3 考考譯文

    一條好消息成了全國(guó)各大報(bào)刊的頭條新聞：近年來(lái)，幾種癌癥的死亡人數(shù)已經(jīng)大大降低了。但是這條新聞對(duì)于許多癌癥患者及其家庭來(lái)說(shuō)仍是憂喜參半。每年，美國(guó)仍有50多萬(wàn)人死于癌癥。事實(shí)上，診斷為癌癥的所有病人中一半以上將在今后幾年內(nèi)死于這種疾病。雖然確實(shí)現(xiàn)在的存活時(shí)間比過(guò)去長(zhǎng)，但是這些病人的生活質(zhì)量往往大大下降了。癌癥 － 以及用來(lái)與癌癥作斗爭(zhēng)的許多治療 － 會(huì)引起疼痛、惡心、疲勞和焦慮，所有這些反應(yīng)通常沒(méi)有得到很好的治療或者根本沒(méi)有治療。

    在國(guó)家專心集中精力治療癌癥時(shí)，我們卻無(wú)意間忽視了對(duì)姑息治療的需要；這種治療注重緩解疾病過(guò)程中的生理和心理癥狀。有效的癥狀控制和支持性治療對(duì)于癌癥病人和他們家人的日常生活來(lái)說(shuō)比什么都重要。然而國(guó)家癌癥研究所（NCI），作為聯(lián)邦政府在癌癥研究和培訓(xùn)方面的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者，在姑息治療的研究和培訓(xùn)方面所花的錢(qián)只占它1999年預(yù)算的1%弱。

    國(guó)家需要嚴(yán)肅認(rèn)真地考慮如何減輕病人不必要的痛苦。國(guó)家癌癥研究所也可以在它所承認(rèn)的癌癥中心中樹(shù)立一些“優(yōu)秀中心”。為了獲得這樣的命名，癌癥中心將向它們服務(wù)的各種病人提供有創(chuàng)新的、高質(zhì)量的姑息治療，培訓(xùn)醫(yī)藥、獲理、心理咨詢、社會(huì)工作和其它學(xué)科方面的專業(yè)人員并進(jìn)行研究。

    姑息治療和晚期病人收容治療的保險(xiǎn)覆蓋范圍迫使人們?cè)诜e極治療和晚期病人收容治療兩者之間做出選擇，這也是問(wèn)題產(chǎn)生的部分原因。這種“二選一”的做法不允許把兩種必需的治療合二而一。醫(yī)療保險(xiǎn)的晚期病人收容治療的保險(xiǎn)金專門(mén)是為晚期病人設(shè)立的，只有預(yù)期病人只能存活六個(gè)月或不到六個(gè)月才允許登記收容。這種保險(xiǎn)金把既尋求姑息治療又尋求可能延長(zhǎng)壽命治療的病人排除在外。

    這就使得晚期病人收容登記對(duì)許多病人來(lái)說(shuō)起到明顯限止的作用。晚期病人收容所，雖然在實(shí)施姑息治療方面可能擁有技術(shù)水平比較高的開(kāi)業(yè)醫(yī)生和比較豐富的治療經(jīng)驗(yàn)，但是不能向真正受益但又在尋求積極治療的病人提供它們的各種服務(wù)。

    死亡是不可避免的，但痛苦的折磨是可以避免的。為了給予癌癥患者從被確診到死亡之前盡可能優(yōu)質(zhì)的長(zhǎng)期生活的希望以及比較好的癌癥治療，我們的公共機(jī)構(gòu)需要提出新的政策，重視并推進(jìn)姑息治療。

    Text 4 考考譯文

    美國(guó)人今天并不十分重視理性才智(與感情和本能相對(duì))。我們的英雄是運(yùn)動(dòng)員、表演家和企業(yè)家，而不是學(xué)者。甚至我們的學(xué)校是我們送孩子去接受實(shí)用教育的地方 -- 而不是為了知識(shí)而去探索知識(shí)的地方。在我們學(xué)校中不難找到普遍存在的反主知主義的跡象。

    “學(xué)校一直是處在更重視實(shí)用性而不是理性知識(shí)的社會(huì)中，”教育作家Diane Ravitch說(shuō)�！皩W(xué)�？梢猿蔀橐粋�(gè)起平衡彌補(bǔ)作用的力量�！� Ravitch的近著 <落后了：學(xué)校改革失敗的100年>，探索了我們學(xué)校中反主知主義的根源，結(jié)論是，現(xiàn)在的學(xué)校根本就不是對(duì)美國(guó)人厭惡知識(shí)追求的起平衡彌補(bǔ)作用的力量。

    但是學(xué)校可以而且應(yīng)該成為一種平衡力。鼓勵(lì)孩子摒棄理性思維的生活，使孩子很容易受到別人的利用和控制。如果沒(méi)有批判思維的能力，沒(méi)有維護(hù)自己思想和理解別人思想的能力，孩子們就無(wú)法充分參與我們的民主生活。沿著這條道路走下去，作家Earl Shorris說(shuō)，“我們將變成一個(gè)二流國(guó)家。我們將成為一個(gè)缺乏文明的社會(huì)�！�

    “理性才智作為權(quán)力或特權(quán)的一種形式而受到憎惡，”歷史學(xué)家Richard Hofstadter教授在其 <美國(guó)生活中的反主知主義> 一書(shū)中寫(xiě)道。該書(shū)在論述美國(guó)政治、宗教和教育中的反主知主義根源方面榮獲了美國(guó)普利策獎(jiǎng)金。從我們的歷史開(kāi)端起，Hofstadter說(shuō)，我們的民主的和平民主義的要求一直驅(qū)使我們摒棄任何帶有精英主義的思想。實(shí)用性、常識(shí)和天智一直被認(rèn)為是比從書(shū)本上學(xué)到的任何知識(shí)更高尚的品質(zhì)。

    Ralph Waldo Emerson和其他先驗(yàn)論哲學(xué)家認(rèn)為，上學(xué)和嚴(yán)格的書(shū)本學(xué)習(xí)人為地限制了孩子：“從10歲到15歲，我們被關(guān)在中學(xué)里和大學(xué)的背誦教室里，比較終等我們出來(lái)時(shí)，知識(shí)滿腹，但什么事也不懂�！榜R克 吐溫的 一書(shū)就是美國(guó)反主知主義的一個(gè)事例。該書(shū)的主人公逃避接受文明的熏陶 – 上學(xué)和學(xué)習(xí)讀書(shū) – 因此他能保持他天生的美德。

    按照Hofstadter的看法，理性才智與天智截然不同。天智是一種我們不愿意崇尚的品質(zhì)。理性才智是思維中長(zhǎng)于批判的、有創(chuàng)造性的和善于思考的一面。天智是要去理解、支配、重組和調(diào)整，而理性才智是考察、沉思、質(zhì)疑、理論化、批判和想像。

    學(xué)校仍然是理性才智受到懷疑的地方。Hofstadter說(shuō)，我們國(guó)家的教育制度是掌握在這樣一些人的手里，他們“高興地、好斗地 。

    宣稱他們對(duì)理性才智的敵視，宣稱渴望認(rèn)同理性才智前景比較差的。