[an error occurred while processing this directive]
第三篇 Valuing Childhood The value of childhood is easily blurred(模糊) in to say's world. Consider some recent developments: the child-murders in the Jonesboro, ark. Schoolyard shooting case were convicted and sentenced. Two boys, 7 and 8, were charged in the murder of an 11-year-old girl in Chicago. Children who commit horrible crimes appear to act of their own will. Yet, as legal proceedings in Jonesboro showed, the one boy who was to address the court couldn't begin to explain his acts, though he tried to apologize. There may have been a motive - youthful jealousy and resentment. But a deeper question remains: why did these boys and others in similar trouble apparently lack any inner, moral restraint(束縛)? That question echoes for the accused in Chicago, young as they are. They wanted the girl's bicycle, a selfish impulse(沖動) common enough among kids. Redemption(拯救) is a practical necessity. How can value be restored to young lives distorted(扭曲) by acts of violence? The boys in Jonesboro and in Chicago will be confined in institutions for a relatively short time. Despite horror at what was done children are not cannot be dealt with as adults, not if a people wants to consider itself civilized. That's why politicians' cries for adult treatment of youthful criminals ultimately miss the point. But the moral void(真空) that invites violence has many sources. Family instability(不穩(wěn)定) contributes. So does economic stress. That void, however, can be filled. The work starts with parents, who have to ask themselves whether they're doing enough to give their children a firm sense of right and wrong. Are they really monitoring their activities and their developing processes of thought? Schools, too, have a role in building character. So do youth organizations. So do law enforcement agencies, which can do more to inform the young about laws, their meaning. And their observance(遵守) 11 The two boys in Chicago were A shot B murdered. C accused. D set free 12 The boys Jonesboro and Chicago apparently lacked a sense of A right and wrong B humor. C gratitude. D safety. 13 According to politicians, when children commit crimes, they should be treated in the same way as A murderers B criminals C victims. D adults. 14 Which of the following does the writer cite as a source of moral void? A Official corruption B Social injustice. C Family instability. D Racial prejudice. 15 Which of the following statements is NOT true according to the passage ? A Parents should give their children instruction in morality. B Schools should help create a moral sense in children. C Law enforcement agencies should do more to help children understand laws D youth organizations have no role to play in building character. 參考答案:41. C 42. A 43. D 44. C 45. D |
輔導科目名稱 |
基礎班 |
精講班 |
沖刺班 |
考題預測班 |
|||||
類別 |
級別 |
課時 |
試聽 |
課時 |
試聽 |
課時 |
試聽 |
課時 |
試聽 |
AB級 |
22講 |
40講 |
20講 |
10講 |
|||||
C級 |
22講 |
40講 |
20講 |
10講 |
|||||
AB級 |
22講 |
40講 |
20講 |
10講 |
|||||
C級 |
22講 |
40講 |
20講 |
10講 |
|||||
AB級 |
22講 |
40講 |
20講 |
10講 |
|||||
C級 |
22講 |
40講 |
20講 |
10講 |
|||||
熱門資料下載: |
職稱英語考試論壇熱貼: |
【責任編輯:育路編輯 糾錯】 |
|
·2011年職稱英語考試衛(wèi)生類真題(部分)匯總 |
·2011年職稱英語衛(wèi)生類B級考試參考答案 |
·2011年職稱英語考試衛(wèi)生類C級真題(部分) |
·2011年職稱英語衛(wèi)生類B級考試真題(部分) |
·2011年職稱英語衛(wèi)生類A級答案完整版 |
·2011年職稱英語衛(wèi)生類A級考試真題(部分) |
·2010年職稱英語衛(wèi)生類C級考試真題答案 |
·2010年職稱英語衛(wèi)生類A級考試真題答案(代碼13 |
·2010年職稱英語衛(wèi)生類C級考試真題答案(代碼31 |
·2010年職稱英語衛(wèi)生類B級考試真題答案(代碼23 |
·2012年職稱英語考試《衛(wèi)生類A級》模擬題(7) |
·2012年職稱英語考試《衛(wèi)生類A級》模擬題(6) |
·2012年職稱英語考試《衛(wèi)生類A級》模擬題(5) |
·2012年職稱英語考試《衛(wèi)生類A級》模擬題(4) |
·2012年職稱英語考試《衛(wèi)生類A級》模擬題(3) |
·2012年職稱英語考試《衛(wèi)生類A級》模擬題(2) |
·2012年職稱英語考試《衛(wèi)生類A級》模擬題(1) |
·2011年職稱英語衛(wèi)生類詞匯選項練習題(9) |
·2011年職稱英語衛(wèi)生類詞匯選項練習題(10) |
·2011年職稱英語衛(wèi)生類詞匯選項練習題(8) |