各位同學，就考研英語真題而言，最后三套建議用來進行考前模擬。小編為大家梳理歷年考研英語真題閱讀文章中涉及的要點，包括詞匯、短語、長難句以及簡單的閱讀方法。接下來看一下2015年考研英語真題閱讀Text 3，這篇文章主要探討了對期刊論文中統(tǒng)計數(shù)據(jù)的進一步審查問題。

　　John Ioannidis, a physician who studies research methodology, says that the policy is “a most welcome step forward” and “long overdue.” “Most journals are weak in statistical review, and this damages the quality of what they publish. I think that, for the majority of scientific papers nowadays, statistical review is more essential than expert review,” he says. But he noted that biomedical journals ... pay strong attention to statistical review.

　　physician“醫(yī)師”;research methodology“研究方法論”;policy“方針，政策”;step“措施”;forward“向前的”;long overdue“姍姍來遲”;be weak in“不擅長”，反義詞組be good at，do well in;statistical review“數(shù)據(jù)審查”;damage“損害，毀壞”;quality“品質(zhì)”;for the majority of“對于大多數(shù)的...”;essential“必要的”;note“特別提到，指出”;biomedical journal“生物醫(yī)學期刊”;pay strong attention to“格外重視”，pay great attention to可以表示“密切關注”。

　　Professional scientists are expected to know how to analyze data, but statistical errors are alarmingly common in published research, according to David Vaux ... Researchers should improve their standards, he wrote in 2012, but journals should also take a tougher line, “engaging reviewers who are statistically literate and editors who can verify the process”. Vaux says that Science’s idea to pass some papers to statisticians “has some merit, but a weakness is that it relies on the board of reviewing editors to identify ‘the papers that need scrutiny’ in the first place”.

　　professional“專業(yè)的，職業(yè)的”;be expected to do“被期望做某事”;analyze“分析”，名詞形式analysis;alarmingly“驚人地，讓人擔憂地”;common“普遍的”，be common to“為...所共有”;according to sb.如果翻譯中出現(xiàn)，可以譯為“某人認為”;standard“標準”;take a tough line“采取強硬措施”;engage“雇傭”;literate“受過教育的”;verify“核實”;pass...to...“傳遞”;merit“優(yōu)點，價值”;weakness“缺點，劣勢”;rely on“依賴”，也可以用depend on/ upon;identify“確定”;in the first place“首先”，寫作中要用到這樣的表示層次的短語。