考研閱讀命題過程全解密

　　Fair and square

　　Some monkeys seem to have a highly developed sense of fairness

　　EVERYBODY loves a fat pay rise. Yet pleasure at your own can vanish if you learn that a colleague has been given a bigger one. Indeed, if he has a reputation for slacking, you might even be outraged. Such behaviour is regarded as “all too human”, with the underlying assumption that other animals would not be capable of this finely developed sense of grievance. But a study by Sarah Brosnan and Frans de Waal of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, which has just been published in Nature, suggests that it is all too monkey, as well.

　　The researchers studied the behaviour of female brown capuchin monkeys, which have all the necessary ingredients to capture the public imagination. They look cute. They are good-natured, co-operative creatures, and they share their food readily. Above all, like their finicky female human counterparts, they tend to pay much closer attention to the value of “goods and services” than males (although why this is so remains a mystery).

　　Such characteristics make them perfect candidates for Dr Brosnan's and Dr de Waal's study. The researchers spent two years teaching their monkeys to exchange tokens for food. Normally, the monkeys were happy enough to swap pieces of rock for slices of cucumber. However, when two monkeys were placed in separate but adjoining chambers, so that each could observe what the other was getting in return for its rock, their behaviour became markedly different.

　　In the world of capuchins, grapes are luxury goods (and much preferable to cucumbers). So when one monkey was handed a grape in exchange for her token, the second was reluctant to hand hers over for a mere piece of cucumber. And if one received a grape without having to provide her token in exchange at all, the other either tossed her own token at the researcher or out of the chamber, or refused to accept the slice of cucumber. Indeed, the mere presence of a grape in the other chamber (in the absence of an actual monkey able to eat it) was enough to induce sullen behaviour in a female capuchin.

　　Dr Brosnan and Dr de Waal report that such behaviour is unusual in their trained monkeys. During two years of bartering prior to these experiments, failure to exchange tokens for food occurred in fewer than 5% of trials. And what made the behaviour even more extraordinary was that these monkeys forfeited food that they could see—and which they would have readily accepted in almost any other set of circumstances.

　　The researchers suggest that capuchin monkeys, like humans, are guided by social emotions. In the wild, they are a co-operative, group-living species. Such co-operation is likely to be stable only when each animal feels it is not being cheated. Feelings of righteous indignation, it seems, are not the preserve of people alone. Refusing a lesser reward completely makes these feelings abundantly clear to other members of the group. However, whether such a sense of fairness evolved independently in capuchins and humans, or whether it stems from the common ancestor that the species had 35m years ago, is, as yet, an unanswered question.

　　總體介紹

　　這是2003年9月18日刊登在《經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家》（The Economist）雜志上的一篇科技類文章。文中主要論述猴子的公平感---像人一樣，對(duì)不公平待遇有怨恨。從文章的題材上講，科技類的文章是考研英語閱讀的四大題材之一(另外三類是經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論、文化教育和社會(huì)生活)，而且這篇文章談?wù)摰氖禽^新的科學(xué)研究成果（《自然》雜志剛發(fā)表的文章），以簡(jiǎn)介的形式出現(xiàn)于《經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家》雜志，自然很適合做考研英語閱讀的出題文章。從體裁上看，這是一篇典型的說明文，屬于考研英語閱讀的常見體裁之一。這篇文章共有6段，520詞，如果用作考研英語閱讀理解的一篇，則段落和字?jǐn)?shù)都有些偏多。因?yàn)樵摬糠值奈恼乱话阋�求將字�(jǐn)?shù)控制在400詞左右；文章段落數(shù)一般為4-5段，便于出題。

　　這篇文章被用于2005年的考研英語閱讀理解部分第一篇，距發(fā)表時(shí)間僅一年多，試題序號(hào)為21-25。文中加下劃線的部分是被刪除的內(nèi)容。改編后的文章共5段，426詞。

　　原文改編

　　命題人主要對(duì)原文進(jìn)行以下幾方面的改編：

　　一、刪去文章標(biāo)題。文章標(biāo)題概括文章的主題，如果出現(xiàn)，文章大意就未睹先知。為了測(cè)試對(duì)文章主題和其他內(nèi)容的理解，閱讀理解原文的標(biāo)題都要?jiǎng)h去，讓考生根據(jù)文章的內(nèi)容去總結(jié)和把握。如這篇文章的副標(biāo)題Some monkeys seem to have a highly developed sense of fairness在考題中就未出現(xiàn)。

　　二、壓縮文章字?jǐn)?shù)。為了把文章字?jǐn)?shù)控制在要求的范圍內(nèi)，可有可無的細(xì)節(jié)、不影響文章總體結(jié)構(gòu)的細(xì)節(jié)內(nèi)容都要?jiǎng)h除。這篇文章第二段的劃線部分和第五段全段被刪去的原因就是如此。

　　三、替換超綱詞匯。為了將超綱詞匯控制在要求的范圍內(nèi)（全文的3%），也為了便于考生真正發(fā)揮閱讀水平，有些超綱詞匯被替換。如這篇文章第四段末句中的sullen behaviour（sullen為超綱詞匯）在考題中被替換為綱內(nèi)詞匯resentment。

　　四、改編其他方面。有時(shí)，為了使文章語言更加精煉，結(jié)構(gòu)更加嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)，在刪去部分內(nèi)容后，相鄰段落被合并。為了使上下文連貫起來，有時(shí)也改寫原文。

　　改編后的文章不僅沒有破壞原文的結(jié)構(gòu)和內(nèi)容，反而顯得更加精煉：結(jié)構(gòu)嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)，層次清晰。第一段以人為類比---人對(duì)于不公平待遇的反應(yīng)是非常憤怒，接著指出研究者比較近通過對(duì)僧帽猴的分組實(shí)驗(yàn)證明這不僅僅是人類的特性，也是猴子的特性。這是研究結(jié)論。后面是對(duì)有關(guān)實(shí)驗(yàn)的各個(gè)方面的敘述：如第二段的實(shí)驗(yàn)對(duì)象的選定，第三段和第四段的實(shí)驗(yàn)的具體內(nèi)容。末段與第一段相呼應(yīng)，并指出僧帽猴的公平感在進(jìn)化上的起源還無法確定。

　　試題設(shè)計(jì)

　　命題人是這樣設(shè)計(jì)試題的：

　　21.In the opening paragraph, the author introduces his topic by

　　[A] posing a contrast.

　　[B] justifying an assumption.

　　[C] making a comparison.

　　[D] explaining a phenomenon.

　　[剖析] 這是一道主旨題，難度很大。難度系數(shù)為0.246(即只有24.6%的考生答對(duì)此題)。問題是“作者一段引出主題的方式”是什么，這等于問一段的寫作方法和文章結(jié)構(gòu)。一段先給出一個(gè)現(xiàn)象：一個(gè)人了解到懶散的（slack）同事比自己得到的加薪更多時(shí)，會(huì)大發(fā)雷霆（outraged），而且一般人認(rèn)為只有人對(duì)于這種不公平待遇有怨恨感（sense of grievance）。作者接著指出一個(gè)研究表明猴子也有這種心理（it is all too monkey, as well）。由此可見作者通過人和猴子的類比引出文章的主題。C“比較（人和猴子）二者的相似之處”符合此意，為正確答案。A“提出一個(gè)對(duì)比”與作者的寫作方法相反。B“證明一個(gè)假設(shè)合理”和D“解釋一個(gè)現(xiàn)象”都與作者在一段運(yùn)用的寫作方法不符，所以都是干擾選項(xiàng)。

　　22.The statement “it is all too monkey” (Last line, Paragraph 1) implies that

　　[A] monkeys are also outraged by slack rivals.

　　[B] resenting unfairness is also monkeys’ nature.

　　[C] monkeys, like humans, tend to be jealous of each other.

　　[D] no animals other than monkeys can develop such emotions.

　　[剖析] 這是一道句子理解題。問題對(duì)應(yīng)一段末句：但是一個(gè)研究…表明這種情感（指上文所說的sense of grievance---不平感）也是“猴之常情”（it is all too monkey）。作者在文章開始指出人對(duì)不公平待遇有委屈感，接著指出猴子也具有這種感覺。B“怨恨不公平也是猴子的本性”符合此意，為正確答案。A“猴子對(duì)于懶散的對(duì)手也會(huì)狂怒”只是說到了表面現(xiàn)象，并未指出與人的類比所揭示的更深的道理---這也是猴子的本性。C“猴子像人一樣，也常常相互嫉妒”與原文不符，因?yàn)樵�文說的是委屈感，而不是嫉妒這種心理。D選項(xiàng)與原文相矛盾，因?yàn)槿艘灿羞@種感覺。本題較難，難度系數(shù)為0.368。

　　23.Female capuchin monkeys were chosen for the research most probably because they are

　　[A] more inclined to weigh what they get.

　　[B] attentive to researchers’ instructions.

　　[C] nice in both appearance and temperament.

　　[D] more generous than their male companions.

　　[剖析] 這是一道事實(shí)細(xì)節(jié)題。問題是“選用female capuchin monkeys做研究，比較有可能是因?yàn)樗鼈兙哂惺裁刺攸c(diǎn)”。根據(jù)問題中的關(guān)鍵詞female capuchin monkeys定位原文二段，二段描述了female capuchin monkeys適合于做研究的特點(diǎn)，其中二段末句指出了它們比較重要的特點(diǎn)：比較重要的是，它們像人類的雌性一樣，比雄性更仔細(xì)地關(guān)注“產(chǎn)品和服務(wù)”的價(jià)值。A“更傾向于權(quán)衡它們所獲得的東西”符合此意，為正確答案。注意：A選項(xiàng)中的more inclined對(duì)應(yīng)二段末句中的tend to，weigh對(duì)應(yīng)原文中的pay attention to，what they get 對(duì)應(yīng)原文中的goods and services。C“外表和脾氣都很好”在二段中提過，但不是female capuchin monkeys的主要特點(diǎn)，與題意不符，所以是干擾選項(xiàng)。本題難度也較大，難度系數(shù)為0.383。

　　24.Dr. Brosnan and Dr. de Waal have eventually found in their study that the monkeys

　　[A] prefer grapes to cucumbers.

　　[B] can be taught to exchange things.

　　[C] will not be co-operative if feeling cheated.

　　[D] are unhappy when separated from others.

　　[剖析] 這是一道事實(shí)細(xì)節(jié)題。問題是“Dr. Brosnan和Dr. De Waal比較終在研究中發(fā)現(xiàn)了猴子的什么特點(diǎn)”。eventually（比較終）這個(gè)詞提示這道題實(shí)際上是問該研究的結(jié)論。本文三段和四段論述研究的具體內(nèi)容，末段總結(jié)了研究結(jié)論。C“猴子如果感覺被騙就不再合作”對(duì)應(yīng)末段第三句“只有當(dāng)每只猴子感覺沒有被騙時(shí)，這類合作才有可能保持穩(wěn)定”，為正確答案。A選項(xiàng)和B選項(xiàng)都不是研究人員的發(fā)現(xiàn)，而是作者在四段陳述的事實(shí)。D選項(xiàng)在原文沒有明確提到，更不是研究人員的發(fā)現(xiàn)。本題難度較小，難度系數(shù)為0.805（即有80.5%的考生答對(duì)此題）。

　　25.What can we infer from the last paragraph?

　　[A] Monkeys can be trained to develop social emotions.

　　[B] Human indignation evolved from an uncertain source.

　　[C] Animals usually show their feelings openly as humans do.

　　[D] Cooperation among monkeys remains stable only in the wild.

　　[剖析] 這是一道推理題。問題對(duì)應(yīng)末段。針對(duì)文章一段提出的猴子也有公平感（sense of fairness）這一點(diǎn)，作者在中間三段以實(shí)驗(yàn)加以證明，末段指出這種公平感是進(jìn)化而來的。末段比較后一句指出這種公平感的進(jìn)化過程尚未確定（an unanswered question）。B“人類的義憤感（indignation）的進(jìn)化來源不確定”符合此意，為正確答案。注意：B選項(xiàng)中的indignation（義憤感）對(duì)應(yīng)末句中的sense of fairness（公平感），uncertain source對(duì)應(yīng)末句中的unanswered question。A“可以訓(xùn)練猴子培養(yǎng)社會(huì)情感”與原文不符，因?yàn)樵�文末段指出猴子的社�?huì)情感是進(jìn)化而來的。C選項(xiàng)在原文沒有提到。D“猴子之間的合作只有在野外時(shí)才保持穩(wěn)定”與原文不符，因?yàn)槟┒蔚谌�句明確指出猴子之間的合作只有在感覺受到公平對(duì)待時(shí)才保持穩(wěn)定。本題難度一般，難度系數(shù)為0.584。

　　注：本文撰寫時(shí)參考了李傳偉編著的《2007年考研英語閱讀真題全方位突破》（中國廣播電視出版社出版）。

    相關(guān)閱讀推薦：

    考研培訓(xùn)輔導(dǎo)熱線：010-51264100  51268840

    考研培訓(xùn)學(xué)校精品課程推薦  報(bào)名有驚喜優(yōu)惠>>  

    考研團(tuán)報(bào) 享受學(xué)費(fèi)比較低價(jià)>>