奶昔直播官方版-奶昔直播直播视频在线观看免费版下载-奶昔直播安卓版本免费安装

育路教育網(wǎng),權(quán)威招生服務(wù)平臺
新東方在線

2012年考研英語閱讀理解精讀高分版(23)

來源:中華考試網(wǎng) 時間:2011-12-30 14:15:20

 WHAT do you do when everyone hates you? That is the problem faced by America's pharmaceutical industry. Despite its successes in treating disease and extending longevity, soaring health-care costs and bumper profits mean that big drug firms are widely viewed as exploitative, and regarded almost as unfavourably as tobacco and oil firms (see chart). Last week, at a conference organised by The Economist in Philadelphia, the drug industry was offered some advice from an unlikely source: a tobacco firm. Steven Parrish of Altria, the conglomerate that includes Philip Morris, gave his perspective on how an industry can improve its tarnished public image.

  Comparing the tobacco and pharmaceutical industries might seem absurd, or even offensive. "Their products kill people. Our products save people's lives," says Alan Holmer, the head of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, an industry association. Yet the drug giants currently face an unprecedented onslaught of class-action lawsuits and public scrutiny; industry bosses are being grilled by lawmakers asking who knew what and when. It is all reminiscent of what happened to the tobacco industry in 1994.

  Mr Parrish advised drug firms to abandon their bunker mentality and engage with their critics. Rather than arguing about the past, he said, it is better to move on, and give people something new to think about. (Philip Morris now acknowledges, for example, that cigarettes are addictive and deadly, and is trying to develop less harmful products.) Not everyone is open to persuasion, so focus on those who are, he said. But changing opinions takes time and demands deeds as well as words: "This is not about spin, this is about change."

  The pharmaceutical industry is pursuing a range of initiatives to mollify its critics, Mr Holmer noted in his own speech. But Mr Parrish suggested that speaking with one voice through a trade association might be counter-productive, since it can give the impression that the industry is a monolithic cartel. And too much advertising, he said, can actually antagonise people further.

  The audience was generally receptive, claims Mr Parrish. This is not the first time he has offered his thoughts on dealing with implacable critics. At a conference at the University of Michigan last year, he offered America's State Department advice on improving America's image in the Middle East. So does his prescription work? There has been a positive shift in attitudes towards tobacco firms, if only a small one. But at least, for once, a tobacco firm is peddling a cure, rather than a disease.

 1.Why is America’s pharmaceutical industry so unpopular?

  A. Because it, like tobacco and oil firms, does harm to people’s health and environment.

  B. Because it fails to cure disease and make people live longer.

  C. Because the prices of its products are too high and its profit margin is too wide.

  D. Because it exploits its employees.

  2.Alan Holmer is quoted to illustrate that __________.

  A. the comparison between tobacco and pharmaceutical industries might seem ridiculous, or even insulting

  B. the pharmaceutical industries agree that they are similar to tobacco industry

  C. tobacco products do more harm to people than pharmaceutical products

  D. pharmaceutical industries are currently facing lots of problems

  3.According to the text, Mr. Parrish gives the following suggestions to drug firms except______.

  A. To acknowledge the problems and try to do something to improve their images.

  B. Not to react to the public in one voice through the drug association.

  C. Not to care about the past.

  D. To try to spend time and energy to persuade the majority of the audience who are open to persuasion.

  4.The word “mollify” (Line 1, Paragraph 4) might mean?

  A. placate.

  B. enrage.

  C. fight.

  D. relieve.

  5.What does the author imply by saying “This is not the first time he has offered his thoughts on dealing with implacable critics.”?

  A. Mr. Parrish has offered his advice to other on dealing with tough critics for several times.

  B. Mr. Parrish has dealt successfully with other critics himself.

  C. Mr. Parrish has given sound advice to drug firms.

  D. Mr. Parrish has been of help to others on critical moments.

 1.答案是C,屬推理判斷題。第一段第2—4行“Despite its successes in treating disease and extending longevity, soaring health-care costs and bumper profits mean that big drug firms are widely viewed as exploitative, and regarded almost as unfavourably as tobacco and oil firms (see chart).”一句中的“soaring health-care costs and bumper profits”是正確回答該問題的關(guān)鍵。“Soaring” 表示“飛漲的”。“bumper” 表示通常表示“豐盛的,豐收的”例如,“a bumper crop”表示“大豐收”;但該詞在本句中與“profits”連用,表示“豐厚的利潤”。

  2.答案是A,屬推理判斷題。該題的關(guān)鍵在于正確判斷出第二段第一句是概括句,而緊隨其

  后的引言是細(xì)節(jié)句。細(xì)節(jié)句是為說明概括句服務(wù)的。由此可以看出引言是用來說明“Comparing the tobacco and pharmaceutical industries might seem absurd, or even offensive.”。

  3.答案是D,屬推理判斷題。本題的關(guān)鍵在于正確理解第三、第四段中帕爾什提出的幾條建

  議。根據(jù)關(guān)鍵詞:advice及其同義詞和句型suggest,better to, so do sth.等,我們可以從第三段和第四段中挑出以下句子,如果能正確理解這些句子,就能順利完成該題。第三段第一句話:“Mr Parrish advised drug firms to abandon their bunker mentality and engage with their critics.” “帕里什先生建議制藥商擯棄他們的掩蔽心理,正面回應(yīng)批評。”“Rather than arguing about the past, he said, it is better to move on, and give people something new to think about.” “他建議說,不要對過去糾纏不清,而是要繼續(xù)發(fā)展,這樣才能讓民眾淡忘過去的一切,看到進(jìn)步。” “Not everyone is open to persuasion, so focus on those who are, he said.”“帕里什還指出,并不是人人都能被說服的。因此集中精力說服那些聽的進(jìn)取的人。”But Mr Parrish suggested that speaking with one voice through a trade association might be counter-productive, “但帕里什先生說,通過行業(yè)協(xié)會發(fā)布一致看法有可能適得其反”。

  4.答案是A,屬猜詞題。根據(jù)上文提到的對制藥業(yè)的批評,可以判斷“The pharmaceutical

  industry is pursuing a range of initiatives to mollify its critics ”中的“mollify its critics”表示“平息批評”。

  5.答案是C,屬推理判斷題。 從本句“This is not the first time he has offered his thoughts on dealing with implacable critics.”,以及下面舉出的例子:他為美國國務(wù)院提建議。結(jié)合在一起可以看出作者隱含的意思是:他認(rèn)為帕里什先生為制藥業(yè)提的建議有道理,會奏效。

   考試須知:2012考研時間安排 應(yīng)試技巧及考場須知 ♦首發(fā)2012考研真題

    考前必看:準(zhǔn)考證下載入口 ♦2012年考研考場規(guī)則2012考研考場查詢

    復(fù)習(xí)備考:政治時事匯總 必背考點(diǎn) 預(yù)測試題 ♦ 英語作文預(yù)測 模板大全

結(jié)束

特別聲明:①凡本網(wǎng)注明稿件來源為"原創(chuàng)"的,轉(zhuǎn)載必須注明"稿件來源:育路網(wǎng)",違者將依法追究責(zé)任;

②部分稿件來源于網(wǎng)絡(luò),如有侵權(quán),請聯(lián)系我們溝通解決。

有用

25人覺得有用

閱讀全文

2019考研VIP資料免費(fèi)領(lǐng)取

【隱私保障】

育路為您提供專業(yè)解答

相關(guān)文章推薦

30

2011.12

2012年考研英語閱讀理解精讀高分版(24)

The Indian finance ministry's mid-year review, released this week, sees the external sector as......

30

2011.12

2012年考研英語閱讀理解精讀高分版(22)

  Not long after the telephone was invented, I assume, a call was placed. The caller was a pa......

30

2011.12

2012年考研英語閱讀理解精讀高分版(21)

  “I've never met a human worth cloning,” says cloning expert Mark Westhusin fro......

30

2011.12

2012年考研英語閱讀理解精讀高分版(20)

  The marvelous telephone and television network that has now enmeshed the whole world, makin......

30

2011.12

2012年考研英語閱讀理解精讀高分版(19)

  One great benefit of the Web is that it allows us to move information online that now resid......

30

2011.12

2012年考研英語閱讀理解精讀高分版(18)

  For thousands of Canadians, bad service is neither make-believe nor amusing. It is an aggra......

您可能感興趣
為什么要報考研輔導(dǎo)班? 如何選擇考研輔導(dǎo)班? 考研輔導(dǎo)班哪個好? 哪些北京考研輔導(dǎo)班靠譜? 2019考研輔導(dǎo)班大全