奶昔直播官方版-奶昔直播直播视频在线观看免费版下载-奶昔直播安卓版本免费安装

育路教育網(wǎng),權(quán)威招生服務(wù)平臺
新東方在線

考研閱讀精選:如何讓大學(xué)學(xué)費(fèi)更公道

來源:新東方在線 時間:2011-10-24 10:01:17

『居高不下的大學(xué)學(xué)費(fèi)已經(jīng)成為學(xué)生的負(fù)擔(dān),如何降低大學(xué)費(fèi)用已經(jīng)成為社會探討的焦點(diǎn)�!�

  How to make college cheaper

  如何讓大學(xué)學(xué)費(fèi)更公道

  July 7th 2011 | from The Economist

  

  DEREK BOK, a former president of Harvard, once observed that “universities share one characteristic with compulsive gamblers: there is never enough money to satisfy their desires.” America’s universities have raised their fees five times as fast as inflation over the past 30 years. Student debt in America exceeds credit-card debt.

  It is truly irritating now that middle-class incomes are stagnant and students are struggling to find good jobs. Hence a flurry of new thinking about higher education. Are universities inevitably expensive? Vance Fried, of Oklahoma State University, recently conducted a fascinating thought experiment, backed up by detailed calculations. Is it possible to provide a first-class undergraduate education for $6,700 a year rather than the $25,900 charged by public research universities or the $51,500 charged by their private peers? He concluded that it is.

  Mr Fried shunned easy solutions. He insisted that students should live in residential colleges, just as they do at Harvard and Yale. His cost-cutting strategies were as follows. First, separate the funding of teaching and research. There is no reason why undergraduates should pay for it. Second, increase the student-teacher ratio. Business and law schools achieve good results with big classes. Why not other colleges? Third, eliminate or consolidate programmes that attract few students. Fourth, puncture administrative bloat. The cost of administration per student soared by 61% in real terms between 1993 and 2007. Private research universities spend $7,000 a year per student on “administrative support”. That is more than the entire cost of educating a student under Mr Fried’s scheme.

  Veteran university-watchers may dismiss Mr Fried’s ideas as pie in the sky. Yet some universities are beginning to squeeze costs. The University of Minnesota’s new campus in Rochester has defined teaching as “job one”. The Harrisburg University of Science and Technology has abolished tenure and merged academic departments.

  Mr Fried fails to mention an obvious source of savings. Americans could complete their undergraduate degrees in three years, instead of four. In practice, most American students take even longer than four years, not least because so many work to pay their tuition.

  Shai Reshef, an educational entrepreneur-turned-philanthropist, is pioneering an even more radical idea. His University of the People offers free higher education, pitching itself to poor people in America and the rest of the world. The university does this by exploiting three resources: the goodwill of academic volunteers who want to help the poor, the availability of free “courseware” on the internet and the power of social networking. Some 2,000 academic volunteers have designed the courses and given the university some credibility. Tutors direct the students to the online courses. They also help to organise them into study groups, and then supervise from afar, dropping in on discussions and marking tests.

  There are plenty of questions about Mr Reshef’s project. Can you really build a university on volunteerism and goodwill? Can students really be relied upon to do most of the teaching themselves?

  Mr Reshef’s university has yet to win accreditation, which could take years. But he can take comfort from Clayton Christensen’s classic book “The Innovator’s Dilemma”. Mr Christensen points out innovators often start by offering products that are cheaper, but markedly inferior. Quickly, however, they learn how to improve their offerings. Even if Mr Reshef fails, there are plenty of other disruptive innovators around. In America, one tertiary student in ten already studies exclusively online. One in four does so at least some of the time, and a growing number of bodies, including elite universities and international organisations, are putting first-rate material online.(584 words)

結(jié)束

特別聲明:①凡本網(wǎng)注明稿件來源為"原創(chuàng)"的,轉(zhuǎn)載必須注明"稿件來源:育路網(wǎng)",違者將依法追究責(zé)任;

②部分稿件來源于網(wǎng)絡(luò),如有侵權(quán),請聯(lián)系我們溝通解決。

有用

25人覺得有用

閱讀全文

2019考研VIP資料免費(fèi)領(lǐng)取

【隱私保障】

育路為您提供專業(yè)解答

相關(guān)文章推薦

24

2011.10

考研閱讀精選:印度央行加息50基點(diǎn)

『印度央行宣布加息50基點(diǎn),緊縮幅度超預(yù)期。』  India's central bank: Fifty sense  印度央行加......

24

2011.10

考研閱讀精選:慷慨行為的進(jìn)化歷程

『人類對陌生人友好的沖動并非是生理異常�!弧 he evolution of generosity:Welcome, stranger  ......

24

2011.10

考研閱讀精選:“綠色化學(xué)”的美好前景

『人們開始對消費(fèi)產(chǎn)品中使用的許多化學(xué)物質(zhì)的安全性提出了質(zhì)疑,因?yàn)槿缃癜l(fā)現(xiàn)這些化學(xué)物質(zhì)和一些包括癌......

24

2011.10

考研閱讀精選:憤怒的另一面

『負(fù)面情緒——憤怒,也有其積極的一面,且看專家們?nèi)绾巫C實(shí)這一現(xiàn)象。』  The Bright Si......

24

2011.10

考研閱讀精選:工資不漲物價漲,家庭開支受影

『物價飛漲增加了家庭開支,而工資收入?yún)s原地不動,這使許多家庭難以應(yīng)付從而改變了購物習(xí)慣�!弧 ......

24

2011.10

考研閱讀精選:巨無霸指數(shù)-快餐引發(fā)的思考

『漢堡,口紅和男士內(nèi)衣有何共同點(diǎn)?一起分享搞怪經(jīng)濟(jì)指數(shù)的樂趣吧�!弧 he Big Mac index: Fast f......

您可能感興趣
為什么要報(bào)考研輔導(dǎo)班? 如何選擇考研輔導(dǎo)班? 考研輔導(dǎo)班哪個好? 哪些北京考研輔導(dǎo)班靠譜? 2019考研輔導(dǎo)班大全