2010考研英語閱讀精讀100篇(高分版)TEXT FIFTEEN
　　Boosted by booming international financial markets, the City of London has not had it so good since the end of the dotcom bonanza in the late 1990s. Basking in double-digit growth rates, London's law firms have both contributed to that success and benefited from it. The earnings of top City lawyers can now exceed £2m a year.

　　Having opted to expand and go global ahead of most others, Britain's leading law firms tend to be bigger than their American rivals. Indeed, according to a survey of the world's top 50 law firms, compiled by Legal Business, a British trade paper, five of the world's top six law firms—in terms of turnover—are now British (if DLA Piper, the result of an Anglo-American merger, is included). But they have tended to lag behind in terms of their profitability. That is now changing.

　　The profit margins of the City's five “magic circle” firms—Clifford Chance, Slaughter and May, Allen & Overy, Linklaters and Freshfields—have soared in recent years and are now comparable with, if not higher than, those of New York's “white shoe” elite. Slaughter and May, the only one of the five not to have gone global, has the joint second-highest profit margin among the top 50.

　　Not so long ago, a London surgeon could expect to earn as much as a City lawyer. But even the recent big rises in hospital consultants' earnings pall in comparison with those enjoyed by London lawyers. At Slaughter and May, for example, average profits per equity partner (PEP) jumped by almost a third (in dollar terms) last year to $2.75m—more than at any other of the top 50 law firms bar two in New York where PEP averaged $2.8m and $3.0m respectively. Some senior partners get a lot more of course.

　　Competition for the best lawyers is fierce and poaching frequent. Hence the need to keep headline PEP figures up—even at the cost of getting rid of equity partners, leaving a bigger share of the bounty for the remaining ones. Freshfields is in the process of shedding around 100 of its equity partners. Other leading firms are also undertaking painful restructuring.

　　Newly qualified lawyers' salaries have also been shooting up in the search for the best talent. Both Freshfields and Allen & Overy now pay their first-year associates £65,000, rising to around £90,000 after three years. (First-year associates at America's top law firms get the equivalent of £80,000.)

　　But, as many other top-rank City employers have discovered, big earnings do not necessarily guarantee big satisfaction. According to a YouGov poll, published by the Lawyer earlier this month, a quarter of Britain's lawyers (including a fifth of law-firm partners) would like to leave the profession. The disgruntled complained about cripplingly long hours, intense competition and the impersonality of the biggest firms (some with more than 3,000 lawyers). So why don't they quit? Because, say three-quarters, of the pay.

　　1. Which one of the following is TURE of the status quo of London’s economy?

　　[A] London is enjoying its best time of economic development since 1990s.

　　[B] The growth rate of London is doubled since the beginning of the 1990s.

　　[C] The growth rate started to boost since the end of the dotcom era.

　　[D] The current economy of London is mostly driven by its legal instead of financial market.

　　2. The world’s top 50 law firms are graded according to _____

　　[A] their annual margin.

　　[B] their profitability.

　　[C] their sale volume.

　　[D] their quantity of business.

　　3.The phrase “white shoe” (Line 3, Paragraph 3) most probably means____

　　[A] white collars.

　　[B] first-class law firms.

　　[C] financial agencies.

　　[D] international banks.

　　4. In order to be competitive, the law firms take the following measures except_____.

　　[A] dismissing equity partners.

　　[B] carrying out restructuring.

　　[C] having their best lawyers turn more competitive.

　　[D] raising salaries for recruiting talents.

　　5. From the YouGov poll, it can be inferred that____

　　[A] this profession is far from satisfactory.

　　[B] most lawyers will leave the profession sooner or later.

　　[C] most lawyers are satisfied with the profession because of the fat pay.

　　[D] high salary is always contradictory to big satisfaction.

　　文章剖析：

　　這篇文章介紹英國倫敦律師事務(wù)所的現(xiàn)狀。第一段講述倫敦因為經(jīng)濟增長迅速，律師業(yè)也受益匪淺;第二、三段講述倫敦律師事務(wù)所在世界上的排名;第四段講述倫敦事務(wù)所律師的工資待遇;第五、六段講述律師事務(wù)所的競爭手段;第七段講述對該行業(yè)的滿意度。

　　詞匯注釋：

　　bonanza n. 富礦帶, 帶來好運之事, 幸運

　　bask v. 曬太陽(享受溫暖), 感到溫暖, 愉快或舒適

　　turnover n. 營業(yè)額

　　pall v.覆蓋, 使平淡無味

　　bounty n. 獎金，補助金

　　disgruntled adj. 不高興的，不滿意的

　　cipplingly adv. 臨界地，極限地

　　難句突破：

　　(1) Indeed, according to a survey of the world's top 50 law firms, compiled by Legal Business, a British trade paper, five of the world's top six law firms—in terms of turnover—are now British (if DLA Piper, the result of an Anglo-American merger, is included).

　　[主體句式] Five of the world’s top six law firms are now British.

　　[結(jié)構(gòu)分析] 這是一個簡單句。前面according to引導(dǎo)的是狀語，狀語中compile by …做前面a survey的定語，而a British trade paper是Legal Business的同位語。

　　[句子譯文]實際上，根據(jù)英國商業(yè)報紙《法律商業(yè)》的一項世界領(lǐng)先50家律師事務(wù)所的調(diào)查，世界領(lǐng)先的六家律師事務(wù)所(按營業(yè)額計算)有五家是英國事務(wù)所(算上英美合資的DLA Piper事務(wù)所)。

　　(2) At Slaughter and May, for example, average profits per equity partner (PEP) jumped by almost a third (in dollar terms) last year to $2.75m—more than at any other of the top 50 law firms bar two in New York where PEP averaged $2.8m and $3.0m respectively.

　　[主體句式] Average profits per equity partner jumped by almost a third.

　　[結(jié)構(gòu)分析] 這是一個簡單句，破折號后面的是前面$2.75m的定語。

　　[句子譯文] 比如在Slaughter and May,去年P(guān)EP平均收入以275萬美元為基數(shù)漲了1/3(以美元計算)，這要比任何全球前50名律師事務(wù)所或美國的律師界工資都高，其PEP平均為280萬美元和300萬美元。

　　題目分析：

　　[答案]A

　　[難度系數(shù)] ☆☆☆☆

　　[分析]細(xì)節(jié)題。這題關(guān)鍵要看對于文章第一句話的理解，Boosted by booming international financial markets, the City of London has not had it so good since the end of the dotcom bonanza in the late 1990s. “have it good”是一個詞組，意思為“過得優(yōu)�！�，那么這句話意思就是倫敦在20世紀(jì)90年代末享受過經(jīng)濟很好的一段時間后，一直到現(xiàn)在才又開始經(jīng)濟很好。選項A比較為符合該句意思，是正確答案。C選項的時間概念不正確，而D選項則是無中生有。

　　[答案]C

　　[難度系數(shù)] ☆☆☆

　　[分析] 細(xì)節(jié)題。文章第二段提到five of the world's top six law firms—in terms of turnover，可以看出是以turnover(營業(yè)額)來評定的。如果不知道turnover的意思，也可以用排除法來選擇。因為第二段提到，要是用收益率來衡量，那么它們排名就不會那么前了，因此A和B可以排除。D的業(yè)務(wù)數(shù)量又從來沒有提及。可以猜出C可能是正確選項。

　　[答案] B

　　[難度系數(shù)] ☆☆☆

　　[分析] 猜詞題。根據(jù)上下文，主要談?wù)摰亩际锹蓭熓聞?wù)所，并沒有涉及到其他的行業(yè)，因此可以推測這里應(yīng)該指的是美國相應(yīng)業(yè)界的同行，這樣才有可比性，那么選項中B比較為符合題意。

　　[答案]C

　　[難度系數(shù)] ☆☆☆

　　[分析] 細(xì)節(jié)題。題干相關(guān)的內(nèi)容在文章第五、第六段有提及。第五段提到，各律師事務(wù)所為了爭奪比較優(yōu)秀的律師采取了許多措施，不得已都要解雇股東合作人，這樣就可以將比較大的利潤給剩下有限的人分配，從而保證頂尖律師的利潤，有的還進行重組。而第六段提到為了找到比較好的人才，還不惜提高新律師的工資。因此，選項中C是沒有提到的。

　　[答案]A

　　[難度系數(shù)] ☆☆☆

　　[分析] 推理題。從文章比較后一段可以看出，該民意調(diào)查中有1/4的律師表明想要離開這個行業(yè)，因為種種不滿意的地方，但還有3/4不會離開就是因為高工資原因。因此，可以看出，律師這個行業(yè)并不讓人滿意，吸引人的只是高收入而已。A反映了這一點。B選項不符合文章比較后一段，因為大多數(shù)律師表示都不會離開;D單單從律師行業(yè)的這個調(diào)查不能反映所有行業(yè)的情況、表述過于絕對。因此，答案為A。

　　參考譯文：

　　雖然受到快速發(fā)展的國際金融市場的推動，倫敦自20世紀(jì)90年代末網(wǎng)絡(luò)富源之后再也沒有享受過原來的好日子。倫敦的律師行業(yè)一直享受著雙位數(shù)的業(yè)績增長速度，既對經(jīng)濟的成功貢獻了自己的力量，又受益于經(jīng)濟成長。目前倫敦市一流律師的年薪超過了200萬英鎊。

　　英國的頂尖律師事務(wù)所選擇了不斷擴張，走在世界前列，目前規(guī)模大于美國同類的事務(wù)所。實際上，根據(jù)英國商業(yè)報紙《法律商業(yè)》一項世界50家領(lǐng)先律師事務(wù)所的調(diào)查，世界排名前六家律師事務(wù)所(按營業(yè)額計算)有五家是英國事務(wù)所(算上英美合資的DLA Piper事務(wù)所)。但是就盈利能力來講，他們卻落后了。不過目前這種情況正在改變。

　　倫敦五家“魔力圈”事務(wù)所(Clifford Chance, Slaughter and May, Allen & Overy, Linklaters and Freshfields)的利潤近年來飛速上升，現(xiàn)在雖然不能說超過，但也可以說已經(jīng)與紐約“白鞋子”精英相抗衡了。Slaughter and May是五家中唯一沒有走向世界的事務(wù)所，目前已經(jīng)成為全球50家第二高利潤事務(wù)所。

　　不久前，倫敦的外科醫(yī)生還有望與市律師收入相當(dāng)。但是盡管比較近醫(yī)院會診醫(yī)生的收入有了大幅增長，但與倫敦律師的工資漲幅比起來還是相形見拙。比如在Slaughter and May,去年P(guān)EP平均收入以275萬美元為基數(shù)漲了1/3(以美元計算)，這要比任何全球前50名律師事務(wù)所或美國的律師界工資都高，其PEP平均為280萬美元和300萬美元。當(dāng)然一些資深律師的收入更高。

　　爭取比較好律師的競爭是激烈的，挖墻角時有發(fā)生。因此，有必要保持名人的PEP數(shù)字上升，有時甚至以犧牲股東為代價，從而將獎金的更大一部分留給剩下的人。Freshfields目前就正在裁減大約100名股東。其他領(lǐng)先的事務(wù)所也同樣經(jīng)歷重組的痛苦。

　　因為業(yè)界在不斷尋找比較好的人才，因此剛獲得資格的新律師起薪也大幅增長。Freshfields 和 Allen & Overy支付給律師的第一年工資為6萬5千英鎊，三年后升至9萬英鎊。(在美國頂尖律師事務(wù)所律師的第一年工資為8萬英鎊。)

　　但是，正如倫敦其他許多頂尖的雇主所發(fā)現(xiàn)的，高工資并不意味著高滿意度。根據(jù)本月初刊登在《律師》上的一項YouGov民意調(diào)查，英國律師有1/4(包括1/5的律師搭檔)都想要離開這個行業(yè)。那些不滿意的人抱怨幾近極限的工作時間、激烈的競爭和比較大事務(wù)所(擁有3000名以上雇工)的非人性化。那么他們?yōu)槭裁床环艞夁@個工作呢? 因為收入，3/4的人這樣回答。